Discussion by NotebookLM
Introduction: Resurrection as Product Roadmap
When Colossal Biosciences announced plans to bring back the dire wolf, headlines immediately summoned images of saber-toothed predators prowling suburban backyards, school field trips to reanimated Ice Age parks, and the faint hope that maybe, just maybe, we could reverse the most irreversible phenomenon in nature: extinction. Behind the enthusiasm, however, is a more grounded and highly scalable development—one that will eventually supply the market with animals that were either lost to history, or never existed at all, except in the imagination of advertisers, animators, and those with enough capital to finance a new kind of living luxury.
The dire wolf may be the opening act. What follows is an era where the genetic toolkit of "proxy engineering" migrates from Pleistocene carnivores to bespoke living-room companions, each iteration built less for environmental restoration than for aesthetics, status, and entertainment. If you've ever wanted to own the tiny elephant of South Park or the DirecTV pillow giraffe, there are scientists, investors, and marketers quietly laying the groundwork. They are simply following demand.
But first: the dire wolf. Its return offers a case study in what's possible, and in what comes next when possibility becomes product.
I. Dire Wolf, v2: Technology as Resurrection
The Modern Dire Wolf
The dire wolf (Aenocyon dirus)—recently revealed to be from an entirely separate lineage than gray wolves (Perri et al., 2021)—is an animal more famous for what it wasn't than what it was. Larger than a gray wolf, separated by millennia of evolution, and catapulted into cultural prominence not by paleontology but by prestige television, it has become a symbol of prehistoric might, extinction, and second chances.
Colossal Biosciences, with much fanfare, is not so much reversing extinction as it is leveraging the science of comparative genomics to manufacture a close approximation. The playbook is as follows:
Ancient DNA Extraction: From the La Brea Tar Pits and other fossil sites, fragments of dire wolf DNA are recovered and sequenced.
Trait Mapping: Modern sequencing technology enables the identification of genes responsible for characteristic features—jaw robustness, tooth structure, metabolic adaptations, and so on.
Proxy Engineering: Using gene editing (CRISPR/Cas9), scientists insert or modify these genetic regions within the embryos of living canids (Doudna & Charpentier, 2014).
Birth of a Stand-In: Embryos are implanted in compatible surrogates, with the goal of producing live animals that mimic dire wolf morphology and, ideally, ecological function.
The process is precise, modular, and marketable. The result is not an authentic Pleistocene predator, but a proxy organism—a curated assembly of traits intended to deliver the essence of "dire wolf" without the messiness of actually returning to the past.
A Repeatable Model
This model—recover, compare, edit, produce—offers a flexible template. The unique advantage is not just the ability to approximate lost creatures, but to manufacture entirely new ones, tailored to taste and trend. The technical work is indifferent to the motivations of its clients, be they conservationists or collectors. The genome, after all, is just code; whether it serves the rewilding of North America or the redecoration of a penthouse is a decision best left to the user.
In many ways, we're witnessing the transformation of biology into software development—complete with release versions, feature requests, and the inevitable pivot toward consumer applications. The dire wolf is simply v1.0 of what promises to be an expansive product line, each iteration more refined, more accessible, and more explicitly designed to satisfy not ecological needs, but consumer desires. As Beth Shapiro writes in "How to Clone a Mammoth," de-extinction technology "could be used to satisfy scientific curiosity, to right past wrongs, or simply to satisfy an itch to see something that no longer exists" (Shapiro, 2015).
II. The Designer Pet Pipeline
From Wild Ancestor to Living Ornament
Once the principle is established, expansion is only a matter of market segmentation. Not everyone needs an apex predator in their neighborhood; many more may prefer animals that evoke the rare, the extinct, or the cartoonishly impossible, but scaled to fit urban life. For every dire wolf, there is a hypothetical micro-mammoth or toy-sized predator, serving as a testament to progress in gene editing, animal husbandry, and the monetization of the once-irreversible.
The transition from dire wolf to designer pet is a matter of consumer demand. Technology will simply follow.
We've already witnessed the evolution of this pattern with conventional pets. What began as working animals—herders, hunters, guardians—have morphed into teacup variations that fit in handbags and generate Instagram followers. The difference now is merely one of technique: instead of generations of selective breeding, we'll accomplish the same outcomes through direct genetic intervention, compressing centuries of domestication into a single laboratory generation. The Economist has already documented how "the rise of the designer dog" has transformed pet ownership from practical companionship to luxury signaling (The Economist, 2019).
The South Park Elephant: A Feasibility Study
Consider the case of the "tiny elephant," a cultural artifact introduced not by science, but by animated television—a trunked mammal, rendered in miniature, small enough for a child to cradle (South Park Studios, 1998). While intended as fiction, it highlights the public's capacity for enthusiasm when imagination becomes plausible.
Scientifically, the project is straightforward in theory. The hyrax, a living Afrotherian mammal, shares a common ancestry with the elephant, despite having long since adopted the lifestyle and appearance of a rodent-sized grazer (Springer et al., 2004). Given sufficient knowledge of both genomes, developmental pathways could be manipulated to favor the re-expression of ancestral traits: a trunk-like appendage, larger ears, thicker skin. With enough precision, the outcome would not be an elephant per se, but a hyrax engineered to project elephant-like features. The scale, lifespan, and metabolic requirements remain manageable—perfect for the home, the influencer, the collector.
The irony, of course, is that nature already tried this experiment. The elephant shrew, with its elongated snout, is what evolution produced when it attempted a "miniature elephant." But evolution lacks marketing departments and venture capital—it can't recognize that what consumers truly want isn't biological efficiency, but recognizable branding in living form.
The DirecTV Pillow Giraffe: Practical Considerations
In a similar vein, the DirecTV "pillow giraffe" demonstrates what advertising can do for demand (DirecTV, 2011). The giraffe is simply an extreme example of limb and neck elongation in ungulates; these features are regulated by well-characterized growth factors and bone-development genes. Suppress those, and one can envision a giraffe reduced to the size of a housecat, spots and all, bred for docility, easy maintenance, and photogenic appeal.
The technical requirements: isolate the relevant growth genes, design a CRISPR editing protocol, and select an appropriate host (perhaps a closely related species, or even a series of synthetic surrogates). Within a few generations—or a few breakthroughs—the "pillow giraffe" transitions from CGI mascot to live inventory.
Of course, the natural world already offers us the dik-dik, a diminutive antelope that stands barely taller than a rabbit. But a dik-dik lacks the brand recognition of a giraffe. It's a reminder that in the coming designer pet economy, familiarity trumps biodiversity, and recognizable IP beats evolutionary ingenuity every time.
III. Methods of Creation: From CRISPR to Artificial Wombs
Genetic Editing as Routine Practice
Gene editing, once a revolutionary breakthrough, is now routine in research labs. CRISPR/Cas9 and its successors allow for precise modifications of animal genomes. Traits that once required generations of selective breeding can now be activated, suppressed, or transplanted with little more than a custom gRNA and some patience (Ledford, 2015).
In the context of designer miniatures, editing can target:
Morphology: Limb and neck proportions, trunk development, tusk or horn presence, skin texture.
Behavior: Docility, activity cycles, tameness.
Coloration: Coat patterns, pigmentation.
Health: Reducing predisposition to disease, optimizing for long-term viability at nonstandard sizes.
Embryonic development is managed through traditional implantation in surrogates or, increasingly, through artificial gestational systems—removing the bottleneck of species compatibility and allowing for higher-throughput experimentation.
What was once the slow work of kennel clubs and breed standards becomes the rapid iteration of biological developers. The Yorkshire Terrier required generations to shrink from rat-catcher to lapdog; its genetically modified successors will transition from concept to commerce in a fraction of the time, with far more exotic source material.
Surrogate Hosts and Synthetic Embryogenesis
Surrogate hosts present both a limitation and a business opportunity. The closer the host to the engineered species, the better the developmental outcomes. Where gaps exist, advances in synthetic embryogenesis and artificial womb technology promise to close them. Already, mammals have been gestated ex utero for significant portions of development in experimental settings (Partridge et al., 2017). The eventual full decoupling of mammalian reproduction from biological surrogacy is not a matter of if, but when.
This decoupling will accelerate design iterations in ways that would make traditional breeders weep with envy—or rage. No longer constrained by gestation periods, litter sizes, or surrogate availability, the production of novelty animals becomes limited only by investor patience and consumer interest. And if there's one thing we've learned from the internet era, it's that both patience and interest expand dramatically when cute animals are involved.
IV. Market Forces and Living Collectibles
Demand Creation and Status Signaling
The potential market for living collectibles is vast. From pet enthusiasts to status-conscious elites, the desire to possess something unique, living, and photogenic is a well-documented driver. In the age of social media, where experience and display are currency, a pillow-sized giraffe or a micro-elephant is simply the logical conclusion of luxury spending and personal branding.
Early adopters are likely to be those for whom price is no object and novelty is a form of competitive advantage. The rest of the market will follow, as advances in technique and scale drive down costs. The transition from symbol of opulence to accessible commodity has already played out in everything from flat-screen televisions to custom dog breeds.
We've already witnessed the lifecycle with conventional luxury pets: what begins as the province of celebrities and oligarchs (think: hairless sphinx cats, exotic Bengal hybrids) inevitably trickles down to middle-class households. The difference is one of scale; the designer creatures of tomorrow will begin at price points that make superyachts seem reasonable, before eventually becoming available at your local pet emporium—probably in seasonal collections with limited-edition colorways. Wired's reporting on why rich people are buying exotic pets demonstrates that this pattern is already established (Wired, 2021).
Regulatory and Ethical Dynamics
As with any new technology, regulation will lag behind innovation. There will be disputes over animal welfare, environmental impact, and genetic escape. Lobbyists and interest groups will advocate for and against the creation of such organisms. But history suggests that where there is demand and sufficient capital, regulatory frameworks adapt, often in ways that prioritize continued innovation and consumption.
Animals designed for living rooms will be bred for low maintenance, hypoallergenic skin, and child-friendly behaviors. Breeding programs will optimize for temperament, as well as appearance. The technical challenge of making an animal that thrives in captivity at miniature scale is matched only by the commercial incentive to deliver it.
Ethical concerns will be addressed not through prohibition, but through market segmentation. Premium "ethically engineered" lines will emerge, promising better welfare standards, more thorough health testing, and perhaps a token contribution to conservation efforts. This ethical veneer will justify higher price points while soothing consumer consciences—a pattern already established in everything from coffee to cosmetics.
The Challenge of Technical Limitations and Public Acceptance
Despite the optimistic projections, significant obstacles remain. Current gene editing techniques, while precise by historical standards, still produce off-target effects that can compromise animal health (Carlson et al., 2012). The gestation of modified embryos encounters immune rejection, developmental abnormalities, and high failure rates—problems that artificial womb technology promises to solve but has not yet delivered.
Public acceptance presents another hurdle. While consumer enthusiasm for novelty is reliable, concerns about animal welfare, genetic pollution, and the ethics of treating living organisms as consumer products could generate resistance (Marris, 2013). Religious objections, conservation purists, and animal rights advocates may form unlikely alliances to slow or regulate the designer pet industry.
Regulatory bodies worldwide remain divided on how to classify and govern gene-edited organisms. The National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine (2017) has called for new frameworks that balance innovation with oversight, acknowledging that existing regulatory structures are ill-equipped for the pace and nature of biotechnological change.
Yet these challenges are likely to delay rather than prevent the emergence of designer creatures. If history is any guide, technical hurdles will be overcome through persistence and funding, while ethical objections will be managed through gradual normalization, self-regulation, and market segmentation offering "responsible" alternatives.
V. The Family Bestiary: Designer Species as the New Norm
Childhood Companions and Genetic Normalization
Future generations may well grow up alongside a range of engineered companions, each a living intersection of biological possibility and consumer preference. The hyrax-derived mini-elephant, the toy giraffe, the domesticated dire wolf proxy—these are simply early entries in a catalog of potential options. The boundaries between pet, collectible, and genetic art will continue to blur.
Ownership of such animals will signal not just wealth, but discernment—a form of living curation. Children will form attachments, Instagram accounts will proliferate, and breeders will respond with ever-more-refined product lines.
For the children of this era, the distinction between natural and engineered will become increasingly irrelevant. A child born in 2035 may view the concept of "natural species" with the same nostalgic curiosity that today's teenagers regard rotary phones: a charming anachronism from a less sophisticated age. Their relationships with living beings will be mediated through the lens of design rather than evolution—pets as products rather than partners in a shared biological history.
At that point, "opulence, they'll has it," will move from meme to observation. The family portrait may include not only a dog or cat, but a miniature elephant reclining in the sunroom, a house-trained giraffe gazing from the windowsill, and whatever else the next wave of bio-entrepreneurs decide to offer.
Perhaps most disturbing of all: the children of these designer companions will grow up assuming this is simply how nature works—that biological innovation flows not from adaptation and selection, but from focus groups and product launches. The notion that we once merely accepted the animals that evolution provided will seem quaint, if not outright primitive. As Adrian Franklin observes in "Becoming Animal," "Modernity has systematically reconstructed our relationship with animals, transforming their status from beings with their own agency to objects designed for human experience" (Franklin, 2007).
Conclusion: The New Natural History
The resurrection of the dire wolf, as realized by proxy engineering, is a proof of concept—a demonstration not merely of technological capability, but of a new relationship between humans and other species. In this relationship, we assume the role not of stewards or companions, but of designers and consumers. Biology becomes less a set of constraints to work within than a palette of options to select from.
The same methods that might restore lost ecosystem functions will, inevitably, deliver the animal companions of yesterday's fiction and today's marketing. The motivations are practical, aesthetic, and deeply human: the desire to own, display, and be seen with something rare, living, and responsive.
In this new natural history, extinction is not a terminal state but a technical challenge. The animals of tomorrow will owe their existence not to evolutionary fitness, but to design, desire, and the intersection of biology and commerce. They will be smaller, cleaner, and cuter than anything produced by nature alone. And, for those who can afford it, they will be waiting—on pillows, in playrooms, and across the feeds of every platform that rewards the visible ownership of something unique.
Elizabeth Kolbert, in her exploration of de-extinction efforts, asks: "What does it mean to restore a species when neither the habitat it evolved in nor the species itself can ever be brought back?" (Kolbert, 2012). The answer, perhaps, is that we are not truly restoring species, but rather creating new ones that serve our contemporary desires—whether for ecological redemption or living room decoration.
If there is any doubt about whether this is the future, look to the lab, the venture capital term sheets, and the Instagram accounts that measure value not in rarity, but in likes. The next menagerie is being written in code, one base pair at a time.
In the final accounting, what we're witnessing is not just the resurrection of extinct species or the creation of fantasy pets, but the complete commercialization of life itself—the transition of biology from something we observe and occasionally domesticate to something we actively design and market. The dire wolf may be scientifically fascinating, but its true significance is as the opening salvo in a future where life is less miracle than merchandise, less evolution than enterprise.
References
Carlson, J., Garbe, J. R., Smith, J. R., et al. (2012). Efficient TALEN-mediated gene knockout in livestock. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 109(43), 17382–17387. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.1211446109
Colossal Biosciences. (2024). Colossal announces dire wolf de-extinction project. https://colossal.com/news/colossal-announces-dire-wolf-de-extinction-project/
DirecTV. (2011). Pillow giraffe commercial [Video].
Doudna, J. A., & Charpentier, E. (2014). The new frontier of genome engineering with CRISPR-Cas9. Science, 346(6213), 1258096. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1258096
Franklin, A. (2007). Becoming animal: Cultural identity and the nature of modernity. Routledge.
Kolbert, E. (2012, December 24). Recall of the wild. The New Yorker. https://www.newyorker.com/magazine/2012/12/24/recall-of-the-wild
Ledford, H. (2015). CRISPR, the disruptor. Nature, 522, 20–24. https://doi.org/10.1038/522020a
Marris, E. (2013). The ethical landscape of de-extinction. Science, 340(6128), 32–33. https://doi.org/10.1126/science.1236314
National Academies of Sciences, Engineering, and Medicine. (2017). Preparing for future products of biotechnology. National Academies Press. https://doi.org/10.17226/24605
Partridge, E. A., Davey, M. G., Hornick, M. A., et al. (2017). An extra-uterine system to physiologically support the extreme premature lamb. Nature Communications, 8, 15112. https://doi.org/10.1038/ncomms15112
Perri, A. R., Mitchell, K. J., Mouton, A., et al. (2021). Dire wolves were the last of an ancient New World canid lineage. Nature, 591, 87–91. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-020-03082-x
Regalado, A. (2017, April 25). Artificial wombs are coming. MIT Technology Review. https://www.technologyreview.com/2017/04/25/106876/artificial-wombs-are-coming/
Sandel, M. J. (2007). The case against perfection: Ethics in the age of genetic engineering. Harvard University Press.
Shapiro, B. (2015). How to clone a mammoth: The science of de-extinction. Princeton University Press.
Shapiro, B. (2017). Pathways to de-extinction: How close can we get to resurrection of an extinct species? Functional Ecology, 31(5), 996–1002. https://doi.org/10.1111/1365-2435.12850
South Park Studios. (1998). An elephant makes love to a pig [Season 1, Episode 5]. In South Park. Comedy Central. https://www.southparkstudios.com/episodes/yf5kt9/south-park-an-elephant-makes-love-to-a-pig-season-1-ep-5
Springer, M. S., Cleven, G. C., Madsen, O., et al. (2004). Mammalian evolution and biomedicine: The afrotherian clade. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, 101(13), 4860–4865. https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.0307172101
The Economist. (2019, July 20). The rise of the designer dog. The Economist. https://www.economist.com/business/2019/07/20/the-rise-of-the-designer-dog
Wired. (2021, July 6). Why rich people are buying up exotic pets. Wired. https://www.wired.com/story/exotic-pets-billionaires/
Thank you for your time today. Until next time, stay gruntled.
Do you like what you read but aren’t yet ready or able to get a paid subscription? Then consider a one-time tip at:
https://www.venmo.com/u/TheCogitatingCeviche
Ko-fi.com/thecogitatingceviche
Share this post